MLS Next Pro
Table 2026 / 2027
Northeast Division
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM | PPG | BTTS | 2.5+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Connecticut FC
|
43 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 49 | 41 | +8 | 3.8 | 1,65 | 78% | 83% |
| 2 |
New England II
|
42 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 40 | 34 | +6 | 3.1 | 1,70 | 65% | 70% |
| 3 |
Columbus Crew II
|
42 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 41 | 36 | +5 | 3.3 | 1,73 | 77% | 73% |
| 4 |
New York RB II
|
41 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 50 | 39 | +11 | 3.7 | 1,61 | 74% | 87% |
| 5 |
New York City II
|
39 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 42 | 35 | +7 | 3.3 | 1,55 | 59% | 68% |
| 6 |
Philadelphia Union II
|
33 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 2.8 | 1,35 | 52% | 52% |
| 7 |
Toronto II
|
30 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 38 | 47 | -9 | 3.7 | 1,27 | 64% | 77% |
| 8 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
19 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 27 | 54 | -27 | 3.4 | 0,61 | 52% | 70% |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Connecticut FC at the top and FC Cincinnati II at the bottom is 24 points.
- • Difference between Connecticut FC at 1st and New England II at 2nd is 1 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Columbus Crew II (9/11 wins, 82%)
- • Best away record: Connecticut FC (8/12 wins, 67%)
- • Biggest home advantage: FC Cincinnati II (+1.3 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: New England II (0.2 difference between home and away)
- • League goals split: 56% scored at home, 44% away (177 home, 140 away)
Table 2026 / 2027
Central Division
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM | PPG | BTTS | 2.5+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Crown Legacy
|
51 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 57 | 33 | +24 | 3.8 | 1,87 | 57% | 70% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga
|
44 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 44 | 35 | +9 | 3.3 | 1,74 | 61% | 57% |
| 3 |
Atlanta United II
|
40 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 52 | 38 | +14 | 3.8 | 1,61 | 61% | 70% |
| 4 |
Chicago FC United
|
39 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 49 | 37 | +12 | 3.6 | 1,43 | 70% | 83% |
| 5 |
Huntsville City
|
35 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 38 | 42 | -4 | 3.3 | 1,30 | 52% | 65% |
| 6 |
Orlando City II
|
35 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 43 | 48 | -5 | 3.8 | 1,35 | 78% | 74% |
| 7 |
Carolina Core
|
26 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 33 | 43 | -10 | 3.2 | 1,00 | 65% | 61% |
| 8 |
Inter Miami II
|
11 | 23 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 21 | 56 | -35 | 3.3 | 0,45 | 55% | 59% |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Crown Legacy at the top and Inter Miami II at the bottom is 40 points.
- • Difference between Crown Legacy at 1st and Chattanooga at 2nd is 7 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Crown Legacy (9/12 wins, 75%)
- • Best away record: Crown Legacy (9/12 wins, 75%)
- • Biggest home advantage: Chicago FC United (+1.3 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: Crown Legacy (0 difference between home and away)
- • League goals split: 59% scored at home, 41% away (198 home, 139 away)
Table 2026 / 2027
Pacific Division
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM | PPG | BTTS | 2.5+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Portland Timbers II
|
50 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 33 | 26 | +7 | 2.5 | 1,96 | 35% | 52% |
| 2 |
LA Galaxy II
|
42 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 47 | 30 | +17 | 3.3 | 1,73 | 64% | 59% |
| 3 |
Los Angeles II
|
41 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 39 | 36 | +3 | 3.3 | 1,59 | 68% | 68% |
| 4 |
Tacoma Defiance
|
33 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 33 | 36 | -3 | 3 | 1,35 | 52% | 61% |
| 5 |
San Jose Earthquakes II
|
33 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 40 | 29 | +11 | 3 | 1,36 | 64% | 55% |
| 6 |
Real Monarchs
|
26 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 32 | 46 | -14 | 3.4 | 1,00 | 55% | 73% |
| 7 |
Whitecaps II
|
19 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 0 | 29 | 53 | -24 | 3.6 | 0,70 | 78% | 70% |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Portland Timbers II at the top and Whitecaps II at the bottom is 31 points.
- • Difference between Portland Timbers II at 1st and LA Galaxy II at 2nd is 8 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Los Angeles II (10/13 wins, 77%)
- • Best away record: Portland Timbers II (11/13 wins, 85%)
- • Biggest home advantage: Los Angeles II (+1.4 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: LA Galaxy II (0 difference between home and away)
- • League goals split: 57% scored at home, 43% away (143 home, 110 away)
Table 2026 / 2027
Frontier Division
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM | PPG | BTTS | 2.5+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Austin II
|
56 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 48 | 19 | +29 | 2.8 | 2,22 | 52% | 48% |
| 2 |
Houston Dynamo FC II
|
48 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 48 | 24 | +24 | 3.1 | 1,95 | 59% | 64% |
| 3 |
St. Louis City II
|
39 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 38 | 35 | +3 | 3 | 1,48 | 57% | 61% |
| 4 |
North Texas
|
33 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 1,27 | 50% | 55% |
| 5 |
Minnesota United II
|
31 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 31 | 36 | -5 | 2.9 | 1,27 | 55% | 55% |
| 6 |
Swope Park Rangers
|
20 | 23 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 57 | -27 | 3.8 | 0,86 | 64% | 77% |
| 7 |
Colorado Rapids II
|
18 | 24 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 24 | 45 | -21 | 2.9 | 0,57 | 61% | 52% |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Austin II at the top and Colorado Rapids II at the bottom is 38 points.
- • Difference between Austin II at 1st and Houston Dynamo FC II at 2nd is 8 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Houston Dynamo FC II (9/11 wins, 82%)
- • Best away record: Austin II (9/11 wins, 82%)
- • Biggest home advantage: North Texas (+0.9 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: Swope Park Rangers (0.1 difference between home and away)
- • League goals split: 56% scored at home, 44% away (142 home, 111 away)
Table 2026 / 2027
Eastern Conference
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM | PPG | BTTS | 2.5+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Crown Legacy
|
51 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 57 | 33 | +24 | 3.8 | 1,87 | 57% | 70% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga
|
44 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 44 | 35 | +9 | 3.3 | 1,74 | 61% | 57% |
| 3 |
Connecticut FC
|
43 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 49 | 41 | +8 | 3.8 | 1,65 | 78% | 83% |
| 4 |
New England II
|
42 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 40 | 34 | +6 | 3.1 | 1,70 | 65% | 70% |
| 5 |
Columbus Crew II
|
42 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 41 | 36 | +5 | 3.3 | 1,73 | 77% | 73% |
| 6 |
New York RB II
|
41 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 50 | 39 | +11 | 3.7 | 1,61 | 74% | 87% |
| 7 |
Atlanta United II
|
40 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 52 | 38 | +14 | 3.8 | 1,61 | 61% | 70% |
| 8 |
New York City II
|
39 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 42 | 35 | +7 | 3.3 | 1,55 | 59% | 68% |
| 9 |
Chicago FC United
|
39 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 49 | 37 | +12 | 3.6 | 1,43 | 70% | 83% |
| 10 |
Huntsville City
|
35 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 38 | 42 | -4 | 3.3 | 1,30 | 52% | 65% |
| 11 |
Orlando City II
|
35 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 43 | 48 | -5 | 3.8 | 1,35 | 78% | 74% |
| 12 |
Philadelphia Union II
|
33 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 2.8 | 1,35 | 52% | 52% |
| 13 |
Toronto II
|
30 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 38 | 47 | -9 | 3.7 | 1,27 | 64% | 77% |
| 14 |
Carolina Core
|
26 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 33 | 43 | -10 | 3.2 | 1,00 | 65% | 61% |
| 15 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
19 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 27 | 54 | -27 | 3.4 | 0,61 | 52% | 70% |
| 16 |
Inter Miami II
|
11 | 23 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 21 | 56 | -35 | 3.3 | 0,45 | 55% | 59% |
| 1 |
Austin II
|
56 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 48 | 19 | +29 | 2.8 | 2,22 | 52% | 48% |
| 2 |
Portland Timbers II
|
50 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 33 | 26 | +7 | 2.5 | 1,96 | 35% | 52% |
| 3 |
Houston Dynamo FC II
|
48 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 48 | 24 | +24 | 3.1 | 1,95 | 59% | 64% |
| 4 |
LA Galaxy II
|
42 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 47 | 30 | +17 | 3.3 | 1,73 | 64% | 59% |
| 5 |
Los Angeles II
|
41 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 39 | 36 | +3 | 3.3 | 1,59 | 68% | 68% |
| 6 |
St. Louis City II
|
39 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 38 | 35 | +3 | 3 | 1,48 | 57% | 61% |
| 7 |
Tacoma Defiance
|
33 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 33 | 36 | -3 | 3 | 1,35 | 52% | 61% |
| 8 |
San Jose Earthquakes II
|
33 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 40 | 29 | +11 | 3 | 1,36 | 64% | 55% |
| 9 |
North Texas
|
33 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 1,27 | 50% | 55% |
| 10 |
Minnesota United II
|
31 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 31 | 36 | -5 | 2.9 | 1,27 | 55% | 55% |
| 11 |
Real Monarchs
|
26 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 32 | 46 | -14 | 3.4 | 1,00 | 55% | 73% |
| 12 |
Swope Park Rangers
|
20 | 23 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 57 | -27 | 3.8 | 0,86 | 64% | 77% |
| 13 |
Whitecaps II
|
19 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 0 | 29 | 53 | -24 | 3.6 | 0,70 | 78% | 70% |
| 14 |
Colorado Rapids II
|
18 | 24 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 24 | 45 | -21 | 2.9 | 0,57 | 61% | 52% |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Crown Legacy at the top and Colorado Rapids II at the bottom is 33 points.
- • The bottom team (Colorado Rapids II) need 9 more points to escape automatic relegation.
- • Difference between Crown Legacy at 1st and Chattanooga at 2nd is 7 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Columbus Crew II (9/11 wins, 82%)
- • Best away record: Portland Timbers II (11/13 wins, 85%)
- • Biggest home advantage: Los Angeles II (+1.4 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: Crown Legacy (0 difference between home and away)
- • League goals split: 57% scored at home, 43% away (660 home, 500 away)
Stats MLS Next Pro 2026 / 2027
All figures below cover 339 played matches in MLS Next Pro 2026 / 2027.
Goals per match
3,27
1107 goals
Both teams to score
61%
207 from the 339
Over 2.5 goals
65%
222 from the 339
Matches with a clean sheet
39%
132 from the 339
Home advantage
| Home win | 163 (48%) |
| Draw | 78 (23%) |
| Away win | 98 (29%) |
| Goals by home teams | 626 (1,85 per match) |
| Goals by away teams | 481 (1,42 per match) |
Over / under goals
| Line | Count | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 324 | 96% | 4% |
| Over 1.5 | 284 | 84% | 16% |
| Over 2.5 | 222 | 65% | 35% |
| Over 3.5 | 146 | 43% | 57% |
| Over 4.5 | 79 | 23% | 77% |
| Over 5.5 | 32 | 9% | 91% |
First and second half
| First half goals | 456 (41%) |
| Second half goals | 563 (51%) |
| Both teams to score in the first half | 74 (22%) |
| Both teams to score in the second half | 97 (29%) |
| Both teams to score in both halves | 27 (8%) |
| Minutes per goal | 27,6 |
Most common scorelines
| Result | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 2 - 1 | 36 | 10.2% |
| 2 - 2 | 33 | 9.3% |
| 1 - 0 | 27 | 7.6% |
| 1 - 1 | 27 | 7.6% |
| 2 - 0 | 19 | 5.4% |
| 1 - 2 | 19 | 5.4% |
| 0 - 2 | 17 | 4.8% |
| 3 - 0 | 16 | 4.5% |
| 3 - 2 | 16 | 4.5% |
| 0 - 0 | 15 | 4.2% |
Scorelines are written from the home team's point of view (354 matches).
Total goals per match
| Goals | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 78 | 22% |
| 4 | 73 | 20.6% |
| 2 | 63 | 17.8% |
| 5 | 48 | 13.6% |
| 1 | 42 | 11.9% |
| 6 | 22 | 6.2% |
| 0 | 15 | 4.2% |
| 7 | 8 | 2.3% |
Cards
| Cards per match | 4,53 |
| Yellow cards | 1459 |
| Red cards | 77 |
| Over 2.5 cards | 82% |
| Over 3.5 cards | 66% |
| Over 4.5 cards | 47% |
| Over 5.5 cards | 31% |
| Over 6.5 cards | 17% |
When the goals are scored
Goals per ten minutes
7%
9%
10%
9%
15%
11%
12%
11%
16%
1-10'
11-20'
21-30'
31-40'
41-50'
51-60'
61-70'
71-80'
81-90'+
Clubs by the numbers
Most goals scored
| Team | Goals |
|---|---|
Crown Legacy
|
54 |
Atlanta United II
|
47 |
Austin II
|
47 |
Houston Dynamo FC II
|
46 |
Chicago FC United
|
46 |
New York RB II
|
45 |
LA Galaxy II
|
45 |
Connecticut FC
|
45 |
Most goals conceded
| Team | Goals conceded |
|---|---|
Swope Park Rangers
|
55 |
Whitecaps II
|
53 |
Inter Miami II
|
53 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
53 |
Colorado Rapids II
|
44 |
Orlando City II
|
43 |
Real Monarchs
|
42 |
Toronto II
|
42 |
Most clean sheets
| Team | Clean sheets |
|---|---|
Portland Timbers II
|
13 |
Austin II
|
11 |
St. Louis City II
|
8 |
Houston Dynamo FC II
|
8 |
Huntsville City
|
8 |
LA Galaxy II
|
7 |
New England II
|
7 |
Chattanooga
|
7 |
Points per match
| Team | Points |
|---|---|
Austin II
|
2,22 |
Portland Timbers II
|
1,96 |
Houston Dynamo FC II
|
1,95 |
Crown Legacy
|
1,87 |
Chattanooga
|
1,74 |
LA Galaxy II
|
1,73 |
Columbus Crew II
|
1,73 |
New England II
|
1,70 |
Both teams to score
| Team | Share |
|---|---|
Whitecaps II
|
78% |
Orlando City II
|
78% |
Connecticut FC
|
78% |
Columbus Crew II
|
77% |
New York RB II
|
74% |
Chicago FC United
|
70% |
Los Angeles II
|
68% |
New England II
|
65% |
Over 2.5 goals
| Team | Share |
|---|---|
New York RB II
|
87% |
Chicago FC United
|
83% |
Connecticut FC
|
83% |
Swope Park Rangers
|
77% |
Toronto II
|
77% |
Orlando City II
|
74% |
Real Monarchs
|
73% |
Columbus Crew II
|
73% |
Most cards per match
| Team | Cards |
|---|---|
Philadelphia Union II
|
3,13 |
Real Monarchs
|
3,00 |
Colorado Rapids II
|
2,83 |
Inter Miami II
|
2,73 |
Connecticut FC
|
2,70 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
2,65 |
Austin II
|
2,57 |
North Texas
|
2,50 |
Players by the numbers
Put this league table on your website
If you want to show the MLS Next Pro table on your website or
Wordpress blog you can add it using the Football Nation League Table Widget.
It's really simple, just go to the widget configurator by clicking the button below and start showing the latest MLS Next Pro league table on your website (it updates itself constantly).
It's really simple, just go to the widget configurator by clicking the button below and start showing the latest MLS Next Pro league table on your website (it updates itself constantly).
Schedule matches 2026 / 2027
Results 2026 / 2027
MLS Next Pro live updates on Discord
Get live match updates for the MLS Next Pro competition using our
Football Nation Discord bot. You will receive a
message in your Discord server when a match starts, ends or is updated (goal, penalty, ...).
Discord command
/live name:mls-next-pro
Read the docs





























