Table
Central Division
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New England II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 4 |
| 2 |
Crown Legacy
|
4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 7 |
| 3 |
New York RB II
|
3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 |
New York City II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 5 |
Philadelphia Union II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 6 |
Toronto II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between New England II at the top and Toronto II at the bottom is 6 points.
- • Difference between New England II at 1st and Crown Legacy at 2nd is 2 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: New England II (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Best away record: New England II (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Most balanced team: New England II (0 difference between home and away)
Table
Pacific Division
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chicago FC United
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 3 |
| 2 |
Orlando City II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 3.5 |
| 3 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 9 |
| 4 |
Inter Miami II
|
3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 |
| 5 |
Columbus Crew II
|
2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 |
Atlanta United II
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 7 |
Huntsville City
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Chicago FC United at the top and Huntsville City at the bottom is 5 points.
- • Difference between Chicago FC United at 1st and Orlando City II at 2nd is 0 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Chicago FC United (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Best away record: Chicago FC United (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Biggest home advantage: FC Cincinnati II (+3 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: Chicago FC United (0 difference between home and away)
Table
Frontier Division
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
San Jose Earthquakes II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 2.5 |
| 2 |
Tacoma Defiance
|
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 7 |
| 3 |
Whitecaps II
|
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 |
| 4 |
Los Angeles II
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 5 |
Portland Timbers II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 6 |
LA Galaxy II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 7 |
Real Monarchs
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | -8 | 0 |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between San Jose Earthquakes II at the top and Real Monarchs at the bottom is 6 points.
- • Difference between San Jose Earthquakes II at 1st and Tacoma Defiance at 2nd is 1 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: San Jose Earthquakes II (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Best away record: San Jose Earthquakes II (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Biggest home advantage: Tacoma Defiance (+2 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: San Jose Earthquakes II (0 difference between home and away)
Table
Eastern Conference
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Minnesota United II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 3.5 |
| 2 |
Colorado Rapids II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 |
| 3 |
North Texas
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 1 |
| 4 |
Sparta-KT
|
4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 |
| 5 |
Swope Park Rangers
|
2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 |
| 6 |
St. Louis City II
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 7 |
Houston Dynamo FC II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Minnesota United II at the top and Houston Dynamo FC II at the bottom is 6 points.
- • Difference between Minnesota United II at 1st and Colorado Rapids II at 2nd is 0 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Colorado Rapids II (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Best away record: Colorado Rapids II (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Biggest home advantage: Sparta-KT (+3 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: Colorado Rapids II (0 difference between home and away)
Table
Western Conference
| # | Team | P | M | M+ | M- | M= | G+ | G- | G+/- | GPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chicago FC United
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 3 |
| 2 |
Orlando City II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 3.5 |
| 3 |
New England II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 4 |
| 4 |
Crown Legacy
|
4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 7 |
| 5 |
FC Cincinnati II
|
3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 9 |
| 6 |
New York RB II
|
3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 |
Inter Miami II
|
3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 |
| 8 |
Columbus Crew II
|
2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Atlanta United II
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 10 |
Huntsville City
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 11 |
New York City II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 12 |
Philadelphia Union II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 13 |
Toronto II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 1 |
Minnesota United II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 3.5 |
| 2 |
San Jose Earthquakes II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 2.5 |
| 3 |
Colorado Rapids II
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 |
| 4 |
North Texas
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 1 |
| 5 |
Tacoma Defiance
|
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 7 |
| 6 |
Whitecaps II
|
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 |
| 7 |
Sparta-KT
|
4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 |
| 8 |
Swope Park Rangers
|
2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 |
| 9 |
Los Angeles II
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 10 |
St. Louis City II
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 11 |
Houston Dynamo FC II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 12 |
Portland Timbers II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 13 |
LA Galaxy II
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 14 |
Real Monarchs
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | -8 | 0 |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
- • The point gap between Chicago FC United at the top and Real Monarchs at the bottom is 6 points.
- • The bottom team (Real Monarchs) need 1 more points to escape automatic relegation.
- • Difference between Chicago FC United at 1st and Orlando City II at 2nd is 0 points.
MLS Next Pro Home/Away Performance
- • Best home record: Chicago FC United (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Best away record: Chicago FC United (1/1 wins, 100%)
- • Biggest home advantage: FC Cincinnati II (+3 points per game at home)
- • Most balanced team: Chicago FC United (0 difference between home and away)
Put this league table on your website
If you want to show the MLS Next Pro table on your website or
Wordpress blog you can add it using the Football Nation League Table Widget.
It's really simple, just go to the widget configurator by clicking the button below and start showing the latest MLS Next Pro league table on your website (it updates itself constantly).
It's really simple, just go to the widget configurator by clicking the button below and start showing the latest MLS Next Pro league table on your website (it updates itself constantly).
Results
MLS Next Pro live updates on Discord
Get live match updates for the MLS Next Pro competition using our
Football Nation Discord bot. You will receive a
message in your Discord server when a match starts, ends or is updated (goal, penalty, ...).
Discord command
/live name:mls-next-pro
Read the docs


























